Inigra Software House

Tag: No-Code

  • Why No-Code MVPs Fail to Scale: The Technical Breakdown Every Founder Should Know

    Why No-Code MVPs Fail to Scale: The Technical Breakdown Every Founder Should Know

    No-code tools like Bubble, Lovable, Replit, and AI-generated builders are an incredible shortcut for launching early prototypes. They allow founders to validate ideas quickly without hiring developers.

    But once the product attracts real users — performance drops, features break, and growth becomes impossible.

    At Inigra Software House, most of the founders who contact us come with the same problem:

    “Our no-code MVP worked for testing, but now users complain, and we can’t add new features.”

    Here’s why it happens — and what to do next.

    1. No-Code MVPs Aren’t Built for Real Traffic

    No-code apps rely on heavy visual builders and auto-generated workflows.
    When 10 people use the app — everything looks fine.
    When 100+ people join — issues appear immediately:

    • slow page loads

    • automation delays

    • broken workflows

    • database timeouts

    No-code platforms don’t optimize queries or infrastructure.
    You can’t upgrade the backend — you can only upgrade your subscription.

    2. Complex Logic Breaks Fast

    As soon as your idea requires more than simple CRUD operations, no-code tools begin to struggle.

    Examples we see often:

    • multi-step automations fail

    • API integrations stop working

    • permissions become messy

    • database relationships get chaotic

    • performance drops with every new feature

    The more complex your product becomes, the more fragile the no-code logic becomes.

    3. Scaling Costs More Than Rebuilding

    Founders often believe no-code is always cheaper.
    This is true only at the beginning.

    But later:

    • plugins cost money

    • complex workflows are slow and difficult

    • reworking broken features takes more time

    • you need specialists who charge more for no-code fixes

    • hosting costs increase rapidly

    At a certain point, rebuilding the app in custom code is cheaper than keeping it alive in Bubble or Lovable.

    4. You Can’t Control Performance or Optimisation

    With no-code you cannot:

    • optimise backend queries

    • add caching

    • control server resources

    • adjust database indexing

    • improve API speed

    • implement efficient architecture

    You are locked inside the platform.
    If it’s slow — there is nothing you can do.

    5. Advanced Features Are Hard or Impossible

    Most founders outgrow no-code when they want:

    • real-time features

    • scalable SaaS architecture

    • advanced payments

    • messaging

    • custom dashboards

    • AI features

    • mobile apps

    • multi-tenant systems

    These require a real backend, real structure and real engineering.

    When Should You Rebuild? (The 4 Clear Signs)

    You should transition from no-code to custom code when:

    1) Users start complaining about speed or bugs

    That’s the #1 sign.

    2) Each new feature takes longer than expected

    Your MVP is hitting limitations.

    3) You plan to raise investment

    Investors expect scalability.

    4) You have more than 50–100 active users

    Most no-code apps break at this level.

    What’s the Solution? Rebuilding With a Real Architecture

    This is where a software house like Inigra comes in.

    We rebuild no-code prototypes using a scalable tech stack such as:

    • Next.js

    • React

    • Node.js

    • NestJS

    • Flutter

    • PostgreSQL

    • Google Cloud Platform

    You get:

    ✔ fast performance
    ✔ clean code
    ✔ scalable backend
    ✔ easy integration with any API or AI model
    ✔ mobile + web support
    ✔ no vendor lock-in

    And the rebuild usually takes 6–10 weeks.

    Conclusion

    No-code is perfect for validating ideas — but not for long-term scaling.
    If your app is getting slower, harder to maintain, or painful to extend, rebuilding into custom code is not just a technical decision — it’s a business advantage.

    Your product can only grow on a foundation designed to grow.

    Ready to scale beyond no-code?

    Book a free 30-minute Discovery Call with our CTO, Paweł Reszka, and we’ll analyse your no-code prototype together.

    👉 https://calendar.app.google/EuxYZ2YtzXYMTGCq9

  • From No-Code to Scalable MVP: When to Rebuild Your Lovable or Bubble App in Custom Code

    From No-Code to Scalable MVP: When to Rebuild Your Lovable or Bubble App in Custom Code

    Over the past few years, thousands of founders have launched their first prototypes using AI no-code tools like Lovable, Bubble, Replit, FlutterFlow, and similar platforms. It’s fast, accessible, cheap and perfect for validating early ideas.

    But there’s a problem:
    no-code almost always breaks the moment you try to scale.

    At Inigra Software House, most of the founders who reach out to us have the same story:

    “We built our prototype in Bubble/Lovable, but now we can’t scale it, extend it or onboard real users.”

    This article explains exactly when a no-code app reaches its limits, what warning signs to watch for, and how to transition into a scalable, stable MVP that can grow with your users.

    Why No-Code Tools Are Perfect for Early Prototypes

    No-code platforms exploded because they remove the heavy barriers of early development.

    The advantages are undeniable:

    • You can launch in days, not months

    • You don’t need developers

    • Costs are low at the beginning

    • Perfect for MVPs, landing pages and simple dashboards

    • Great for validating demand before spending real money

    For early testing, no-code tools are excellent.
    For building a long-term product — not so much.

    Where No-Code Starts Breaking Down

    Once your app gets real usage, no-code limitations appear very quickly. These are the issues we see most often when clients come to us.

    1. Performance Issues (Slow Pages, Lags, Freezes)

    Bubble and Lovable generate a lot of hidden code and heavy workflows. As your user base grows, so does the load on the system.

    Common symptoms:

    • Pages loading in 3–8 seconds

    • Inputs freezing

    • Database searches timing out

    • Mobile version glitching

    • Workflows failing randomly

    This kills user experience immediately.

    2. High Cost of Adding New Features

    Ironically, the farther you go with no-code, the more expensive it becomes:

    • Plugins cost money

    • Advanced features require hacks

    • Workflows turn into spaghetti

    • Developers charge more because no-code is harder to extend

    At some point, rebuilding is cheaper than “patching.”

    3. Limited Flexibility and Customization

    No-code platforms limit what you can control:

    • Backend architecture

    • Database optimisation

    • Server performance

    • Security

    • Real-time features

    • Advanced automations

    • Custom integrations

    Anything beyond “simple app logic” becomes painful.

    4. Vendor Lock-In

    This is the biggest risk.

    You can’t export your code from Lovable or Bubble.
    You depend 100% on the platform.

    If the platform:

    • raises prices

    • limits features

    • changes infrastructure

    • suffers downtime

    Your product is stuck — with no escape route.

    5. Inability to Add Complex Features

    As soon as founders want anything “more advanced”, no-code hits a wall. For example:

    • Real-time notifications

    • Multi-tenant SaaS

    • Complex payment logic

    • AI features

    • Advanced dashboards

    • Messaging

    • Heavy file processing

    • Enterprise integrations

    This is the moment most founders contact a software house.

    6 Signs It’s Time to Move From No-Code to Custom Code

    After working with hundreds of prototypes, we see the same triggers over and over again.

    1) Your app slows down with real users

    If 20–50 users are enough to break performance — it’s time.

    2) Every new feature takes days or weeks

    When development starts feeling like “fighting the platform.”

    3) You hit platform limitations

    If Bubble/Lovable says: “This isn’t possible,” that’s your answer.

    4) You’re preparing to raise money

    Investors expect scalable architecture.

    5) You can’t onboard more users

    Your prototype wasn’t built for real traffic.

    6) You want to grow beyond a simple MVP

    At this stage, no-code becomes a blocker — not a tool.

    How Inigra Rebuilds No-Code Apps Into Scalable MVPs

    This is the exact process we use at Inigra Software House to transform fragile prototypes into stable, production-ready MVPs.

    Step 1 — Technical Audit

    We review everything from your no-code build:

    • screens

    • workflows

    • database

    • automations

    • API calls

    • user flows

    • bugs

    • performance

    Outcome: a clear rebuild plan with full transparency.

    Step 2 — UX/UI & Architecture Redesign

    We prepare:

    • modern UI/UX (web + mobile)

    • scalable backend architecture

    • database schema

    • development roadmap

    • complete scope

    • user stories

    You see exactly what we will build before coding starts.

    Step 3 — Full-Stack Development

    We rebuild your prototype using a tech stack designed for real scalability, such as:

    • Next.js / React

    • Node.js / NestJS

    • Flutter (mobile apps)

    • PostgreSQL / Firebase / Supabase

    • Google Cloud Platform

    The result:

    • lightning-fast performance

    • clean infrastructure

    • easy future development

    • secure code

    • no vendor lock-in

    Step 4 — QA, Testing & Launch

    We handle:

    • performance tests

    • security checks

    • automated testing

    • deployment

    • maintenance

    You receive a polished, stable, scalable MVP — ready for real users.

    How Much Does Rebuilding Cost?

    Based on our projects:

    💰 Small MVP: £5,000–£10,000

    💰 Medium MVP: £10,000–£20,000

    💰 Advanced MVP: £20,000–£30,000+

    ⏱ Typical timeline: 6–10 weeks

    Rebuilding is almost always cheaper than continuing on no-code.

    Example Scenario (Generic)

    A founder launched a Lovable prototype in 72 hours.
    Great validation.
    50 beta users joined.

    Then:

    • load times: 6 seconds

    • workflows breaking

    • database errors

    • UI not working on mobile

    • advanced features impossible

    We rebuilt the product using:

    • Next.js

    • Node.js

    • PostgreSQL

    • fully optimized UX

    In 8 weeks they had:

    • 12× faster performance

    • scalable architecture

    • clean, extendable components

    • stable backend

    • mobile-ready UI

    This is the typical transformation.

    Conclusion

    No-code is excellent for launching fast — but not for growing.
    If your product is gaining traction or running into limitations, rebuilding into custom code is the natural next step.

    This transition doesn’t have to be slow, expensive or stressful — especially with an experienced full-stack team.

    Ready to Scale Beyond No-Code?

    Book a free 30-minute Discovery Call with our CTO, Paweł Reszka.
    We’ll review your prototype and tell you exactly what it takes to rebuild it into a market-ready MVP.

    👉 Book here:
    https://calendar.app.google/EuxYZ2YtzXYMTGCq9